Posted by Shitbag Adulterer McCain on April 10, 2007, 4:33 am
You think we don't know more about energy storage than you do, EEYORE
Posted by Eeyore on April 10, 2007, 6:00 am
Shitbag Adulterer McCain wrote:
Yes I think you know nothing valuable whatever about energy storage.
Posted by Hysterical leftwing global war on April 7, 2007, 10:07 pm
On Apr 7, 5:30 pm, "simple_langu...@yahoo.com"
You need approx. 40,000 of the largest wind turbines to power a medium
sized city as well.
More B.S. anti-nuke, anti-traditional power generation pipe-dreams...
Posted by Steve O'Hara-Smith on April 8, 2007, 6:06 am
On 7 Apr 2007 15:07:42 -0700
Hmm I believe the largest wind turbine is a 1.5MW unit - so a
medium size city require 60 GW ? OK so we probably only get 25% of the
rated capacity - 15 GW still sounds high for a medium city it sounds about
right for a large city of 10 million or so.
Now that's enough to make it impractical for wind to carry the base
load so you didn't need to exaggerate.
C:>WIN | Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins. | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licences available see
Posted by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roland_M=F6sl?= on April 9, 2007, 7:14 pm
This was some years ago.
Most new installations have 2 to 5 MW
In average are 2000 full power hours per year.
So 4000 to 10000 MWh per year.
http://car.pege.org cars and traffic
http://live.pege.org building and live